Are OWS and Other 99% Protests Worth The Effort? Is the 1% Too Strong For a Non-Cohesive Message?

70

By Peter Leeper

Have a Message?

Albeit, I am not the type that gets inspired to pay much attention to protests, whether they are in my country the United States let alone some other foreign land where one is much more likely to be beheaded on the streets than their attention be paid, let alone partake in one. I generally feel regardless of what political persuasion the protesting groups are from, that they (protesters) are generally the vocal kooks in our largely quiet relatively sane majority. Maybe my protest is not protesting at all? Honestly and unfortunately the “kooks” get the headlines and the rest of us are forced to listen to their gripes whether or not there is any cohesion in message, forethought in strategy, or plan for exit.

First things first, when putting together a protest be sure your group has at least some semblance of a consistent message and focus where your point can be driven home, again and again and again. An example where this was seen being done successfully was at the beginning stages of the Tea Party Movement. Now, I am no fan of these peoples political persuasion, what they care about, or what they want our country to be, but that doesn’t matter. They had and have a cohesive message and focal point. Namely, they hate Barack Obama and will do whatever they can to keep any of his policies from taking hold. It wasn’t perfect though; there were some kooks that out kooked the regular kooks by interjecting their racial prejudices into protests that were primarily intended to rally against increased taxes and against any kind of socially mandated healthcare. Either case however seems to be fueled by lack of perspective, experience, information, and general fear about the unknown. The Tea Party movement has also been successfully because their strategy was well thought out and executed well. They held gatherings, had a catchy name and symbols from American history like the Boston Tea Party and re-enactments thereof. People waving tea bags around were pretty lame in my opinion however and led to a very unfortunate nickname given to them in the form of “tea baggers”. I still chuckle a little about that one! The Tea Party’s exit strategy is yet to be seen however lately it seems it may be nominating the least electable presidential candidate the world has ever seen. If that happens, they will have executed their strategy well but failed in their efforts ultimately.

A NYC OWS Protest Being Silenced by Police

Occupy This!

The Occupy Wall Street protesters, whose political leanings I am more likely to share compared to the Tea Party is, in my opinion, the perfect example of a protest that fails all three of my measures for success in protest. First, they have absolutely no cohesion in message. They seem to have relatively good organization and “Occupy” groups have sprung up in various sizes to protest in cities across the United States. The problem is that most of us witnessing their activity have no clue for what they are asking. “We Hate Corporations”…Yeah! Wait, now what? We demand….stuff! “I will sit in this city park until I smell worse than that homeless guy over there!” Granted, they get a lot of attention but do their protests have any traction whatsoever? Step one of successful negotiation; know what you are asking for! We all get that the unemployment level is way too high and the underemployment rate is even worse. Yes corporations have too many tax loopholes. Will closing them make more money available to hire…you? And where is the Occupy movement’s forethought in strategy? Yes, they have gathered in masses and have made local government and police agency's lives a living hell but have the protesters become no more than a public nuisance? The way they are being thrown out of parks in NYC makes it appear that way. That strategy isn’t working. The only thing that they can do with their masses is what the Tea Party did; they ultimately expressed their opinions in the ballot box. Young people need to go out and vote to make a difference instead of protesting as an excuse for something to do. Needless to say, the “Occupiers” have no exit plan because that would involve having a strategy to begin with. Well played!

Comments

Druid Dude profile image

Druid Dude Level 4 Commenter 6 months ago

I like this hub. I think what they lacked was a LEADER. They were like individual lifeboats floating in a shark infested sea, brought down by too little focus, not just by the protestors, but by the news media. All I saw was token coverage and no stand outs...no faces or names to remember. They were sunk by complacency, and apathy. To shed the corporate hold will take more than words.

yellowstone8750 profile image

yellowstone8750 Level 2 Commenter 6 months ago

See my Hub on the same sunject, We are both right. I was a member of the SDS in the 60s and suffered the same fate

American Romance profile image

American Romance Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

... tea partiers interjected racist view points??? You lie my friend! You cannot and will NEVER be able to prove that one!

Anyone associated with the OWS crowd would have to be a loser!

Facts: look at the OWS crowd, nasty, thugish looking, piles of hyperdermic needles(NY POST) violence, special tents set up for females because of rapes! Not a one of these could hold down a job! Urination openly, disrupting real working men and women just trying to pay the bills etc!

Momma always said if you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas!

Compare all of this to the tea party folks ( am not a member by the way) Tea Party people are sincer, have a cause, leave their areas clean and orderly, no violence, they use the voting booth to get their demands met, Who would anyone want to be associated with?

Hollie Thomas profile image

Hollie Thomas Level 4 Commenter 6 months ago

I'm afraid I disagree with your analysis. Leaders tend to be co-opted. The message the OWS, however, put forward is as you say (I'm paraphrasing here) general and not specific. However, if they become a real nuisance, particularly to the 1%, they will no longer need to demand anything- The 1% will make the concessions- It will be down to the 99% as to weather they accept them. Where does power lie?

American Romance profile image

American Romance Level 7 Commenter 6 months ago

Hollie, I like your comment, the 1% can get on a plane and be lieing on the beach with a servant handing them drinks in the morning! The OWS can't even rent heaters to help them through the cold nights!..........where does the power lie indeed! Point is those 1% can take their money and leave!.....of course they will take their companies, jobs, trickle down economics etc.with them!...........where does that leave the winning OWstreeters? still living in tents I suppose?

Peter Leeper profile image

Peter Leeper Hub Author 5 months ago

Hi all, Thanks for your comments! I was hoping this hub would provoke some discussion and each of your had an opinion from very different perspectives!! I love it!

oh, and i hyperlinked the area that I mention some instances of race baiting at tea party rallies. Of course most Tea party people are not racist but I think their is valid opinion that some had creeped into the events.

brages07 profile image

brages07 Level 3 Commenter 6 weeks ago

Good hub. I will say that there is a fairly consistent viewpoint among the Occupiers, namely an increased emphasis on direct democracy in our politics and workplace democracy in the form of worker cooperatives. Unfortunately, this often gets buried in mainstream media coverage of Occupy Wall Street.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working